Featured
John Edwards: The second act
Having announced my selection in the upcoming Missouri Democratic primary (part of Super Tuesday, Inc.), it occurred to me that perhaps as many as two or three people might be curious as to how John Edwards earned the Waveflux seal of approval. The answer in one word: class, the manifestations and disparities of which give rise, Hydralike, to aspects of American society as varied as race, health care, education, taxation, housing, even environmental issues. The reality of class, the prevalence of poverty, is something that few care to contemplate. Poverty is decidedly unglamorous, after all, so much so that people avoid even acknowledging it, as if doing so meant risking contamination. It is, for many, evidence of moral failing - thus the emphasis in some quarters on helping the “deserving” poor. In a culture where the virtues of wealth, attainment, and upward striving are extolled from cradle to grave, going so far as to identify oneself as a member of a lower economic class is, well, a political clunker. To say nothing of being, in the age of The Apprentice, Paris Hilton, ad nauseum, a real media downer.
A presidential candidate with the courage to push class front and center, given the culture’s hostility to the concept, was an easy pick for me.
Of course, Edwards’ campaign was doomed from the start for that very reasons. Other circumstances (like being a plain old white-guy-running who lacks the compelling historical/rockstar interest of a Clinton or Obama) seem incidental in comparison. The sad fact is that forty-four years after the declaration of the War on Poverty - and incredibly, two years after Hurricane Katrina - this society simply isn’t ready for the core message Edwards brought in his two White House campaigns: that policy, not charity, is the path to helping the poor.
So far as the 2008 presidential campaign is concerned, Edwards’ chief role has been that of progressive conscience/gadfly to the two frontrunners. His presence in the race has served to prompt Clinton and Obama into making, at the very least, supportive noises on poverty issues. That’s the best Edwards can hope for - and that alone justifies voting for him. What interests me, though, is what happens after the lights go dark and Edwards shuts down his campaign.
Edwards may be invited to play a role in a Clinton or Obama administration. If I could gain his attention for three minutes, I would implore him to decline such an invitation. I would recommend that he take a month off following the campaign, and then spend a long time in conversation with his fellow Southerners Jimmy Carter and Al Gore…after which he should go right back to his Center on Poverty in Chapel Hill. Edwards should return to what he has described as the work of his life, aware that there is much to do on a cultural and societal level before the nation can face up to the manifold issues of poverty. He should return to this work, confident in the knowledge that there is more than one form of public service.
Life is generous in that it often provides us with second opportunities, new venues for action and contribution. We have seen grand examples of political figures rising from defeat to accomplish more for the public good in private life than they ever accomplished while in office. I think John Edwards has the opportunity for just such a second act, if he chooses to accept the challenge of moving a culture toward the recognition of inconvenient truths.
« « The Waveflux endorsement | WWMLKD? » »
Edwards = White people!
Edwards is out
Tough second choice
Edwards, after all
Three take-away points from Bittergate
Discussion
Comments are closed for this post.
Advocated
Offered
Categorized
Linked
Podcasted
Commented
- Phil Barron on Egg in bread, eh?
- Camera Obscura on Egg in bread, eh?
- Bitty on Obama-Biden: Er, feel it
- Phil Barron on Obama-Biden: Er, feel it
- Phil Barron on Obama-Biden: Er, feel it
Monitored by SiteUptime
I absolutely concur. In fact, I think it might be better for this man’s vision and mission to steer clear. Edwards might ultimately be thankful if he isn’t saddled with the broken political system.
So glad you wrote this. Reaching out to the millions of disenfranchised and to tie into the international social reform movement would be far more powerful IMO. As Gore did with Global Warming, Carter did with Peace, John Edwards might be a clarion voice among many for Class, for Poverty.
I completely agree. I will vote for Edwards in the Dem primary in Oregon. I wish this country WAS ready for a message with substance. One that requires character, courage, and action from those who hear it. SIGH. John will better serve his country keeping his ONE Corps organization going.
I think the task is so much harder than affecting a condition of global warming because our ideas about class are so personal and upsetting them is personally threatening. It seems to me, though, that you almost have to start outside of Washington in order to reach people where they live.
Sigh, indeed!
i’m glad you put “deserving” in quotes. that’s one of the problems, too many people feel that only a few of the poor “deserve” a hand up out of poverty.
not until a significant number of us believe that ALL people deserve to not be poor, will we make some headway on this.
i do have one quibble, though. the corporate media have done their best to bury edwards, but i’d sure like for us bloggers to hold off on declaring his candidacy dead.
that said, i agree that he shouldn’t take a place in the next administration if he’s not the one elected president.
not until a significant number of us believe that ALL people deserve to not be poor, will we make some headway on this.
That’s it exactly. An economist would probably call this assertion rather simplistic, but it sure seems as though this is a necessary condition.
i do have one quibble, though. the corporate media have done their best to bury edwards, but i’d sure like for us bloggers to hold off on declaring his candidacy dead.
I appreciate that, and held off writing this because of just that sentiment. It’s not exactly supportive of a campaign to explain why you think it won’t be successful, which is fine - unless you actually are a supporter, in which case it sucks.
But then, I think Edwards has more important and useful things to do than be president anyway.
i understand why a black person would want to vote for obama. there is a part of me that wants a ‘madam president’ for that same reason. i just don’t think obama has enough experience as a political candidate to withstand what the republicans will do this fall. we really cannot afford to lose this one. mt first choice of the three is edwards, as well. but, alas, he has no cash, and no cash=no win. i think he would make a great v.p.
[...] (Expansion on the endorsement here.) [...]
[...] going to join Hipparchia and Philip Barron of Waveflux in backing John Edwards as the Democratic nominee for [...]
[...] I said a few days ago, there is still a noble purpose awaiting him, elections [...]
[...] of time for him to become a relatively non-partisan elder stateman. What’s the quid pro quo? My thinking earlier was that Edwards should devote himself to anti-poverty policy outside of public office, not unlike [...]