Blogged
Troop reduction or reshuffle?
Bad enough that this NYT headline - “Mixon: U.S. Troop Reduction Could Begin in Jan. 2008″ - is thoroughly misleading, as Maj. Gen. Mixon is describing only the possibility of reducing the number of troops assigned to northern Iraq, but reporter Ann Tyson seems strangely incurious about just where those reassigned troops are going.
Mixon’s announcement sounds like a preparation of the political ground for a surge within the surge; those “reduced” troops could well be bound for Baghdad, where the Iraqi police are less than trustworthy and bodies are filling the streets.
Adjacent posts:
Similar posts: « « Nearer my God to Thee | Wheels up! » »
Paging Harry Levins
“Want Political Truth? Buy a Book”
“Incremental news”
Bet the other way
Difficult to keep up
Advocated
Offered
Linked
Commented
- Phil Barron on Kitty City: Population, eight
- Andrea on Kitty City: Population, eight
- Bitty on “Never even heard of them”
- zuleika on “Never even heard of them”
- odanu on “Never even heard of them”
Tagged
Afghanistan Ars Domestica Barack Obama Baseball Blogging Bush Administration Business Cats Congress Consumerism Cooking Crime Crime and Punishment Day Job Democrats Economy Fantasy Football Football General News Humor Iraq John McCain Journalism LaVena Johnson Media Meta Missouri Movable Type Movies Personal Politics Race Religion Republicans Sports St. Louis St. Louis Cardinals St. Louis Post-Dispatch Technology Television Waveflux Web White House 2008 WordPress Writing
Discussion
Comments are closed for this post.
Comments are closed.